Economic burden of patients with post-surgical chronic and transient hypoparathyroidism in the United States examined using insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Hypoparathyroidism (HP) is a rare endocrine disease commonly caused by the removal or damage of parathyroid glands during surgery and resulting in transient (tHP) or chronic (cHP) disease. cHP is associated with multiple complications and comorbid conditions; however, the economic burden has not been well characterized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with post-surgical cHP, using tHP as a reference. METHODS: This analysis of a US claims database included patients with both an insurance claim for HP and thyroid/neck surgery between October 2014 and December 2019. cHP was defined as an HP claim ≥ 6 months following surgery and tHP was defined as only one HP claim < 6 months following surgery. The cHP index date was the first HP diagnosis claim following their qualifying surgery claim, whereas the tHP index date was the last HP diagnosis claim following the qualifying surgery claim. Patients were continuously enrolled at least 1 year pre- and post-index. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, all-cause HCRU, and costs were descriptively analyzed. Total all-cause costs were calculated as the sum of payments for hospitalizations, emergency department, office/clinic visits, and pharmacy. RESULTS: A total of 1,406 cHP and 773 tHP patients met inclusion criteria. The average age (52.1 years cHP, 53.5 years tHP) and representation of females (83.2% cHP, 81.2% tHP) were similar for both groups. Neck dissection surgery was more prevalent in cHP patients (23.6%) than tHP patients (5.3%). During the 1-2 year follow-up period, cHP patients had a higher prevalence of inpatient admissions (17.4%), and emergency visits (26.0%) than the reference group -tHP patients (14.4% and 21.4% respectively). Among those with a hospitalization, the average number of hospitalizations was 1.5-fold higher for cHP patients. cHP patients also saw more specialists, including endocrinologists (28.7% cHP, 15.8% tHP), cardiologists (16.7% cHP, 9.7% tHP), and nephrologists (4.6% cHP, 3.3% tHP). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the increased healthcare burden of cHP on the healthcare system in contrast to patients with tHP. Effective treatment options are needed to minimize the additional resources utilized by patients whose HP becomes chronic.

Reduced heart failure-related healthcare costs with Furoscix versus in-hospital intravenous diuresis in heart failure patients: the FREEDOM-HF study.

Aim: Compare heart failure (HF) costs of Furoscix use at home compared with inpatient intravenous (IV) diuresis. Patients & methods: Prospective, case control study of chronic HF patients presenting to emergency department (ED) with worsening congestion discharged to receive Furoscix 80 mg/10 ml 5-h subcutaneous infusion for ≤7 days. 30-day HF-related costs in Furoscix group derived from commercial claims database compared with matched historical patients hospitalized for <72 h. Results: Of 24 Furoscix patients, 1 (4.2%) was hospitalized in 30-day period. 66 control patients identified and were well-matched for age, sex, ejection fraction (EF), renal function and other comorbidities. Furoscix patients had reduced mean per patient HF-related healthcare cost of $16,995 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Furoscix use was associated with significant reductions in 30-day HF-related healthcare costs versus matched hospitalized controls.

What is this article about? In heart failure (HF), the heart cannot pump as well as it should. This causes blood to back up in the vessels that return blood to the heart. Fluid leaks from these vessels and collects in vital organs such as the lungs. This fluid build-up is called congestion. Congestion causes symptoms such as shortness of breath, tiredness and leg swelling. Furoscix is a prescription medicine, a diuretic, that treats congestion. Diuretics help get rid of extra fluid by increasing urination. Congestion is usually managed with oral diuretics, but sometimes congestion cannot be controlled by oral diuretics and patients may have to spend several days at a clinic or hospital to receive diuretics given through a vein (intravenous or iv.). Furoscix is a new formulation of furosemide, a common diuretic, and is delivered into the skin (subcutaneous) by a self-administered pump instead of through an iv. Our investigation aimed to answer two questions Can Furoscix be given to patients at home instead of in the hospital with iv. diuretics? Is there a cost savings to using Furoscix? Instead of being admitted to the hospital for iv. diuretics, HF patients with worsening congestion who came to the emergency department were sent home to receive Furoscix 80 mg/10 ml 5-h subcutaneous infusion for ≤7 days. 30-day costs related to HF in these patients were compared with costs from similar group of patients previously hospitalized for iv. diuretics. What were the results & what do they mean? In patients who needed to be admitted to the hospital for iv. diuretics, Furoscix given at home instead reduced congestion and resulted in significant cost savings. Patients with heart failure, who are not getting relief with oral diuretics, can be treated with Furoscix at home without having to be admitted to the hospital for iv. diuretics. Use of Furoscix instead of iv. furosemide can save money to the healthcare system.

Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients on ibrutinib compared to other CLL treatments in a real-world US cross sectional study.

The objective of this study was to describe real-world health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction of ibrutinib-treated patients with CLL compared to a reference group. This study was completed in two parts. The first portion (Norming Study) was a US online survey conducted to serve as a reference population. The Norming Study included a total of 139 patients with CLL, excluding those treated with ibrutinib: 64 were treatment naive (Tx naive), 36 were 1st line (1L), and 38 were in or had completed ≥2 lines (2L+) patients with CLL. The second portion (CLL Ibrutinib Study) included 1L and 2L+ ibrutinib patients with CLL treated for ≥6 months in which 118 patients (1L n = 88 and 2L+ n = 30) completed the study. Respondents completed demographic and clinical information and the following HRQoL surveys: (Short Form-12v2® Health Survey [SF-12v2], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G], FACT-Leukemia [FACT-Leu] Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue, and Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire [CTSQ]). Higher scores indicate better HRQoL/treatment satisfaction. Differences in effect sizes between the two samples at the group level were calculated using Hedges' g. Medium to large positive effects were seen in the CLL Ibrutinib group on several measures compared to the Reference Study groups. The FACT-G total score was 89.2±11.1 for CLL Ibrutinib Study patients compared to 75.8±22.6 CLL Norming Tx naïve patients, 61.3±21.8 in 1L, and 61.7±20.7 in 2L+. Similar trends were seen with FACT-Leu total score and FACIT-Fatigue. CLL Ibrutinib Study patients scored higher on all CTSQ domain scores compared to the CLL Norming patients treated with other CLL therapies. We found that Ibrutinib-treatment had better HRQoL and treatment satisfaction compared to patients receiving other therapies, irrespective of line of therapy.

The economic burden of HIV-associated wasting in the era of modern antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: HIV-associated wasting (HIVAW) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV (PWH). Evaluating health care resource utilization and cost predictors of HIVAW is important in understanding the overall economic burden of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden and cost predictors associated with HIVAW. METHODS: This analysis of the IBM MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid databases included members with a claim for HIV (using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes) between July 2012 and September 2018, with the HIV index date defined as the first HIV diagnosis claim in the dataset. PWH were excluded if they were aged less than 18 years, had any malignancy claim, or had less than 6 months of enrollment data pre-HIV or post-HIV index date. Members were defined as having HIVAW using an algorithm of claims for weight loss-related diagnoses, appetite stimulant or nontestosterone anabolic agents, or enteral/parenteral nutrition at any time post-HIV index. Taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) was defined as having at least 1 pharmacy claim of any ART 12 months post-HIV index. Total all-cause costs were calculated as the sum of payments for hospitalizations, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and pharmacy use. A multivariate generalized linear model with log-link and γ distribution was used to estimate the impact of HIVAW predictors of total all-cause costs. RESULTS: Among 42,587 members with HIV included in the study (64.6% male; mean age: 44 years; 67.5% insured with Medicaid; and 63.9% taking ART), the overall prevalence of HIVAW was 18.3% during the study period. HIVAW prevalence was 17.9% for those taking ART and 19.1% for those not taking ART. Prevalence by payer type was 7.5% for Commercial ± Medicare Supplemental and 23.5% for Medicaid. Members with HIVAW had more comorbidities and opportunistic infections compared with members without HIVAW. Members with HIVAW were also more than twice as likely to be hospitalized (71.1% vs 32.1%) and had 5 times the number of hospitalizations (1.0 vs 0.2) and twice the number of emergency department visits (3.0 vs 1.3) per year post-index compared with members without HIVAW (P < 0.01). HIVAW was associated with 1.3-times-higher mean annualized total all-cause costs per member (95% CI = 1.26-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: HIVAW remains prevalent despite advances in ART and is associated with additional health care resource utilization and costs. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between HIVAW and comorbidity burden and ART utilization and payer types. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100004755). Dr Siddiqui has received consulting and speaking fees from AbbVie, BioFire, Cumberland, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA, and Merck. Dr Samuel, Ms Hayward, Ms Wirka, Dr Phillips, and Dr Harbour are employees of EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA. Drs Deering and Harshaw are employees of EPI-Q, Inc., which received payment from EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA, for the development and execution of this study.

Real-world Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Ibrutinib or Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia by Risk Status.

INTRODUCTION: Certain genetic features in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are associated with inferior outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). This retrospective study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with CLL, stratified into high-risk and non-high-risk groups, who received first-line ibrutinib or CIT therapy. METHODS: High-risk group included confirmed presence of del(17p), del(11q), unmutated IGHV, TP53 mutations, or complex karyotype. Weighted high-risk ibrutinib and CIT groups were compared for treatment effects using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Hazard ratios [95% CI] (HR) for time to next treatment (TTNT) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Bendamustine/rituximab was the most common CIT regimen initiated for high-risk patients. During the available follow-up (median 34-35 months), 74.7% of the weighted high-risk ibrutinib group received only one line of treatment, compared with 47.2% of the weighted high-risk CIT group. The most common second-line treatment was ibrutinib for those in the CIT groups and venetoclax for the ibrutinib groups. The weighted high-risk ibrutinib group had a significantly longer TTNT (median not reached) than the weighted high-risk CIT group (median 34.4 months) and was 54% less likely to start a new treatment (HR 0.5 [0.3-0.6], P < 0.010). Among CIT-treated groups, high-risk patients had significantly shorter median TTNT than non-high-risk patients (P < 0.010). However, within the ibrutinib-treated groups, the median TTNT was similar between high-risk and non-high-risk patients (HR 2.2 [1.0-5.0]; P = 0.060). CONCLUSION: This study found that first-line single-agent ibrutinib therapy was associated with significantly longer TTNT than CIT regimens in real-world patients with high-risk CLL. The results support the use of ibrutinib in high-risk patients. INFOGRAPHIC.

HIV-associated wasting prevalence in the era of modern antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the prevalence of HIV-associated wasting (HIVAW) in the United States. DESIGN: Medical and pharmacy claims study using IBM MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental and Medicaid Databases. METHODS: Study period: July 2012-September 2018 (first HIV diagnosis claim = HIV index date). People with HIV (PWH) were excluded if they were aged less than 18 years, had any malignancy claim or had less than 6 months of enrollment data pre or post-HIV index date. HIVAW was defined by proxy using claims for weight loss-related diagnoses, appetite stimulant/nontestosterone anabolic agents or enteral/parenteral nutrition. Prevalence was reported cumulatively, by insurance type and antiretroviral therapy (ART) pharmacy claims (defined as ≥1 pharmacy claim of any ART within 12 months post-HIV index date). Statistical analysis assessed factors potentially associated with HIVAW. RESULTS: The study population comprised 42 587 PWH (64.6% male, mean age 44 years, 67.5% on Medicaid, 63.9% on ART). Cumulative HIVAW prevalence (2012-2018) was 18.3% (n = 7804) for all PWH (17.9% on ART, 19.1% not on ART). HIVAW prevalence by payer was 7.5% for Commercial and Medicare Supplemental and 23.5% for Medicaid. The strongest associations with the likelihood of meeting the definition of HIVAW were for individuals with Medicaid and hospitalization(s) post-HIV index date; race and ART status were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest HIVAW remains prevalent in PWH. ART use was not found to be associated with HIVAW. HIVAW was highest among those with Medicaid coverage or any hospitalization(s). Further research is needed to better understand additional factors associated with and contributing to HIVAW.

Current practices in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: A previous survey of physician self-reported practice patterns in the management of CML was conducted in 2005. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European LeukemiaNet guidelines now include nilotinib and dasatinib in their treatment algorithms for CML. To assess these new guidelines, a cross-sectional survey of US hematologists and/or oncologists was conducted in December 2010 through an online survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey had 43 questions consisting of items updated from the 2005 survey to reflect changes in clinical practice, tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, and current guidelines. RESULTS: Analysis of the responses from 507 board certified medical oncologists/hematologists suggests that the use of imatinib 400 mg as an initial treatment option had decreased from 62% in 2005 to 52% in the 2010 survey. Currently, nearly 40% of physicians would choose either nilotinib or dasatinib as first-line treatment. From the surveyed physicians, achievement of at least a major molecular response (MMR) is the predominant treatment goal in chronic phase CML. CONCLUSION: This survey emphasizes the need for continued updates and education regarding optimal therapy, monitoring practices, and therapeutic end points in CML.

Comparing outcomes associated with dose manipulations of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the incidence of reported gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients treated with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and to examine the impact of dose manipulations on biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 379 renal transplant recipients initiated on EC-MPS or MMF through 3-months posttransplant between the years of 2001 to 2007. Descriptive univariate analyses were used for comparisons of baseline characteristics and outcome measures between the cohorts. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the time to a first BPAR event. RESULTS: GI complications occurred at an incidence of 52.8% and 48.9% in the EC-MPS and MMF cohorts, respectively (NS). Patients requiring dose manipulations due to GI complications were 19.7% with EC-MPS and 25.3% with MMF (NS). The mean equimolar dose reduction below 2000 mg was 930+/-292.13 mg with EC-MPS and 933+/-173.95 mg with MMF (NS). Patients treated with EC-MPS experienced significantly fewer BPAR episodes than those treated with MMF (14% EC-MPS vs. 23.1% MMF; P =0.0221). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, EC-MPS had a similar incidence of GI complications and dose manipulations compared with MMF. Despite similar GI complication rates and dose manipulations, treatment with EC-MPS seemed to result in a lower incidence of BPAR. Based on these observations, more studies need to be conducted to evaluate risks for BPAR relating to mycophenolic acid product.